* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            diff(X1,mark(X2)) -> mark(diff(X1,X2))
            diff(mark(X1),X2) -> mark(diff(X1,X2))
            diff(ok(X1),ok(X2)) -> ok(diff(X1,X2))
            if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> mark(if(X1,X2,X3))
            if(ok(X1),ok(X2),ok(X3)) -> ok(if(X1,X2,X3))
            leq(X1,mark(X2)) -> mark(leq(X1,X2))
            leq(mark(X1),X2) -> mark(leq(X1,X2))
            leq(ok(X1),ok(X2)) -> ok(leq(X1,X2))
            p(mark(X)) -> mark(p(X))
            p(ok(X)) -> ok(p(X))
            proper(0()) -> ok(0())
            proper(false()) -> ok(false())
            proper(true()) -> ok(true())
            s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
            s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
            top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
            top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))
        - Signature:
            {diff/2,if/3,leq/2,p/1,proper/1,s/1,top/1} / {0/0,active/1,false/0,mark/1,ok/1,true/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {diff,if,leq,p,proper,s,top} and constructors {0,active
            ,false,mark,ok,true}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 2
          0_1() -> 3
          active_0(2) -> 2
          active_1(2) -> 4
          active_2(3) -> 5
          diff_0(2,2) -> 1
          diff_1(2,2) -> 3
          false_0() -> 2
          false_1() -> 3
          if_0(2,2,2) -> 1
          if_1(2,2,2) -> 3
          leq_0(2,2) -> 1
          leq_1(2,2) -> 3
          mark_0(2) -> 2
          mark_1(3) -> 1
          mark_1(3) -> 3
          ok_0(2) -> 2
          ok_1(3) -> 1
          ok_1(3) -> 3
          ok_1(3) -> 4
          p_0(2) -> 1
          p_1(2) -> 3
          proper_0(2) -> 1
          proper_1(2) -> 4
          s_0(2) -> 1
          s_1(2) -> 3
          top_0(2) -> 1
          top_1(4) -> 1
          top_2(5) -> 1
          true_0() -> 2
          true_1() -> 3
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            diff(X1,mark(X2)) -> mark(diff(X1,X2))
            diff(mark(X1),X2) -> mark(diff(X1,X2))
            diff(ok(X1),ok(X2)) -> ok(diff(X1,X2))
            if(mark(X1),X2,X3) -> mark(if(X1,X2,X3))
            if(ok(X1),ok(X2),ok(X3)) -> ok(if(X1,X2,X3))
            leq(X1,mark(X2)) -> mark(leq(X1,X2))
            leq(mark(X1),X2) -> mark(leq(X1,X2))
            leq(ok(X1),ok(X2)) -> ok(leq(X1,X2))
            p(mark(X)) -> mark(p(X))
            p(ok(X)) -> ok(p(X))
            proper(0()) -> ok(0())
            proper(false()) -> ok(false())
            proper(true()) -> ok(true())
            s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
            s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
            top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
            top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X))
        - Signature:
            {diff/2,if/3,leq/2,p/1,proper/1,s/1,top/1} / {0/0,active/1,false/0,mark/1,ok/1,true/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {diff,if,leq,p,proper,s,top} and constructors {0,active
            ,false,mark,ok,true}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))